Definition: Then the king, when he heard [these] words, was sore displeased with himself, and set [his] heart on Daniel to deliver him: and he laboured till the going down of the sun to deliver him.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from Daniel 6:14. It’s a really interesting passage about loyalty and responsibility! Here's what it means in simpler terms: The Basic Idea: The king was worried about Daniel because he knew Daniel was a spy – someone who was trying to secretly tell the king about something dangerous. He felt like he needed to protect Daniel, even if it meant doing something difficult and challenging. Let’s unpack it piece by piece: "Then the king, when he heard [these] words..." - This tells us that the king was told about something specific – Daniel was being watched or suspected of spying. "...was sore displeased with himself..." - The king felt bad about letting this happen to him. He realized he might have made a mistake. "...and set [his] heart on Daniel to deliver him..." - This is the core of the verse. The king decided he would take action to rescue Daniel. He wasn't just going to ignore it; he was actively seeking to help him. "...and he laboured till the going down of the sun to deliver him." – This is a big, dramatic statement. “The going down of the sun” means it was dark and late in the day. The king worked tirelessly (for as long as the sun set) until he found a way to rescue Daniel. What’s the message? This verse teaches us about: Responsibility: It shows that we have a responsibility to people – especially those who are important or trustworthy. Loyalty & Protection: It emphasizes the importance of being loyal and protecting those who are valuable to you. Diligence & Perseverance: The king’s hard work demonstrates that it's often necessary to do what needs to be done, even when it's tough. In short, the verse is a story about a king making a difficult decision to protect someone he knows is potentially dangerous. --- Do you want me to: Explain another part of Daniel 6? Give you a slightly more detailed explanation of the context of the story?